Open Access
| Numéro |
2017
18th International Congress of Metrology
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Numéro d'article | 15004 | |
| Nombre de pages | 4 | |
| Section | Optical agile measurement / Flexibilité des mesures optiques | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/metrology/201715004 | |
| Publié en ligne | 18 septembre 2017 | |
- Barbero B.R., Ureta E.S. Comparative study of different digitization techniques and their accuracy. Computer Aided Design, 43 (2): 188–206, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Lartigue C., Contri A., Bourdet P. Digitised point quality in relation with point exploitation. Measurement, 32: 193–203, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Zúniga L.D.O., Piratelli-Filho A. Method to check performance of laser scanners using tridimensional artifact. Proc. of COBEM, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil, November 3-7, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Besic I., Gestel N.V., Kruth J-P., Bleys P., Hodolic J. Accuracy improvement of laser line scanning for feature measurements on CMM. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 49 (2011): 1274–1280. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gestel N.V., Cuypers S., Bleys P., Kruth J-P. A performance evaluation test for laser line scanners on CMMs. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 47: 336–342, 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]