Open Access
Issue
2013
16th International Congress of Metrology
Article Number 04003
Number of page(s) 5
Section Outils mathématiques / Mathematical tools
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/metrology/201304003
Published online 07 October 2013
  • BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML, Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, JCGM 100:2008 (2008).
  • BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML, Evaluation of measurement data – Supplement 1 to the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement – Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method, Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, JCGM 101:2008 (2008).
  • BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML, Evaluation of measurement data – Supplement 2 to the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement – Extension to any number of output quantities, Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, JCGM 102:2011 (2011).
  • A. Possolo, B. Toman, Assessment of measurement uncertainty via observation equations, Metrologia, 44, 464–475 (2007) [CrossRef]
  • A. Gelman, J.B. Carlin, H.S. Stern, D.B. Rubin, Bayesian Data Analysis – Second edition , (Chapman and Hall, London, 2003).
  • W. Bich, M. G. Cox, R. Dybkaer, C. Elster, W. T. Estler, B. Hibbert, H. Imai, W. Kool, C. Michotte, L. Nielsen, L. Pendrill, S. Sidney, A. M. H. van der Veen W. Wöger, Revision to the “Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement“, Metrologia, 49, 702–705 (2012) [CrossRef]
  • D. Wild, editor, The Immunoassay Handbook, Elsevier (Third edition, Amsterdam, 2005).
  • K. Klauenberg, B. Ebert, J. Voigt, M. Walzel, J. E. Noble, A. E. Knight, C. Elster, Bayesian analysis of an international ELISA comparability study, Clin. Chem, Lab. Med., 49, 1459–1468 (2011). [CrossRef]
  • R. C. Baker, Flow Measurement Handbook, Cambridge University Press (2000).
  • P. J. Brown, Measurement, Regression, and Calibration, Oxf. stat. sc. ser. (Clarendon Press Oxford, 1993).
  • W. J. Parker, W. J. Jenkins, C. P. Butler, G. L. Abbott, Flash method of determining thermal diffusivity, heat capacity and thermal conductivity, J. Appl. Phys., 32, 1679–1684 (1961). [CrossRef]
  • B. Hay, J. R. Filtz, J. Hameury, L. Rongione, Uncertainty of thermal diffusivity measurements by laser flash method, Int. J. Therm., 26, 1883–1898 (2005). [CrossRef]
  • B. Vogelstein, K. W. Kinzler, Digital PCR, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 96, 9236–9241 (USA, 1999). [CrossRef]
  • R. Sanders, J. F. Huggett, C. A. Bushell, S. Cowen, D. J. Scott, C. Foy, Evaluation of Digital PCR for Absolute DNA Quantification, Anal. Chem., 83, 6474–6484 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • G. Pohl, Ie-Ming Shih, Principle and applications of digital PCR, Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn., 4, 41–47 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • A. S. Whale, J. Huggett, S. Cowen, V. Speirs, J. Shaw, S. Ellison, C. A. Foy, D. J. Scott, Comparison of microfluidic digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring copy number variation, Nucl. Acids Res., 40, 1–9, (2012). [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.